Air
Force Tactical Command 1
Commando
Tactische Luchtstrijdkrachten (CTL)
Part I | Part II | Part III | Part IV | Part V | Part VI | Part VII | Part VIII
Unit |
Location |
Peace
Strength |
War
Strength |
Staff
Air Force Tactical Command [a] |
Zeist |
?
|
?
|
(Staff)
COMTWOATAF [b] |
Mönchengladbach-Rheindahlen (GE) |
?
|
? |
Unit |
Main
Equipment |
Air
Combat Role |
Peace
Strength |
War
Strength |
Soesterberg
Air Base [c]
|
32
(US) Tactical Fighter Squadron [d]
|
16
x F-15C, 2 x F-15D |
AD |
?
|
? |
334
Squadron [e]
|
12
x F-27 |
|
?
|
? |
298
Squadron [f] |
24
x Alouette III |
|
48/45/60
(153) |
56/50/77
(183) |
Maintenance
and Materiel Squadron [f]
|
|
|
6/95/70
(171) |
6/100/98
(204) |
221
Squadron [g] |
└ 73
Assault Firing Unit |
3
x I-HAWK |
|
(30-35) |
(±100) |
└ SHORAD
flight |
3
x Flycatcher, 9 x 40L70 |
|
(30-35) |
(±100) |
10
Air Force Security Squadron [h] |
|
|
2/21/110
(133)
|
5/19/143
(167) |
Air
Force Security Platoon x 7 |
|
|
– |
1/4/41 (46)
x 7 |
510
Object Security Squadron [Royal Army] [i] |
|
|
– |
5/15/105
(125) |
511
Object Security Squadron [Royal Army] [i] |
|
|
– |
5/15/105
(125)
|
Leeuwarden Air
Base [j]
|
322
Squadron [k]
|
16
x F-16A, 2 x F-16B 29 |
FBA/AD |
?
|
? |
323
Squadron [l] |
16
x F-16A, 2 x F-16B 29 |
FBA/AD
|
?
|
?
|
Transition
and Conversion Division F-16 [m] |
4 x
F-16A, 3 x F-16B |
|
?
|
?
|
Search
and Rescue Flight [n] |
4 x
Alouette III |
|
?
|
?
|
Detachment
De Vliehors [o] |
|
|
?
|
?
|
Detachment
Noordvaarder [o] |
|
|
?
|
?
|
119 Squadron [g] |
└ 71
Assault Firing Unit |
3
x I-HAWK |
|
(30-35) |
(±100) |
└ SHORAD
flight |
3
x Flycatcher, 9 x 40L70 |
|
(30-35) |
(±100) |
30
Air Force Security Squadron [p] [q] |
|
|
1/15/62
(78)
|
5/18/139
(162) |
Air
Force Security Platoon x 4 [q] |
|
|
– |
1/4/41 (46)
x 4 |
514
Object Security Squadron [Royal Army] [q] [r] |
|
|
– |
5/15/105
(125) |
515
Object Security Squadron [Royal Army] [q] [r] |
|
|
– |
5/15/105
(125)
|
582
Object Security Platoon [Royal Army] [q] [r] |
|
|
– |
1/4/33
(38) |
583
Object Security Platoon [Royal Army] [q] [r] |
|
|
– |
1/4/33
(38) |
585
Object Security Platoon [Royal Army] [q] [r] |
|
|
– |
1/4/33
(38) |
Notes
a. |
Peacetime
organisation. Headed by Commander Tactical Air Force (Commandant
Tactische Luchtstrijdkrachten, CTL). Comprising a War Preparations and
Plans Bureau and four sections: Personnel, Operations, Logistics and
Economic Management. On
mobilisation the staff of Air Force Tactical Command would merge with
those elements of the staff of Logistic and
Training Command
(Commando Logistiek en Opleidingen, CLO) that were responsible for
logistic support,
forming the Tactical Air Force War Staff (Oorlogsstaf
Tactische
Luchtstrijdkrachten, OS/TL). Nearly all units subordinate to CLO would
in wartime fall under the Tactical Air Force War Staff; see Logistic and
Training Command,
note a. Commander Tactical Air Force would head
the War Staff. The War Staff would mainly comprise five divisions
(afdelingen): Operations, Materiel Logistics, Personnel Logistics,
Communications and Electronics, Medical Affairs; and a Staff Element
(for) Automation. The Medical Affairs Division, handling second echelon
medical care, would comprise four mobilised medical groups, in
Harmelen, Goirle, Deventer and Hesepe (GE) respectively, which would
together have thirteen mobilised field dressing stations under,
probably, administrative control: in Rijswijk and Werkhoven (Medical
Group Harmelen); Gemert, Hilvarenbeek, Sint Oedenrode and Riel (Medial
Group Goirle); Bolsward, Boekelo, Wychen and Ede (Medical Group
Deventer); Schwagstorf (GE), Borghorst (GE) and Eidinghausen (GE)
(Medical Group Hesepe (GE)). These field dressing stations would
include mobilised Royal Army medical detachments; see Royal Air Force, note i.2
|
b. |
Commander
Second Allied Tactical Air Force
(COMTWOATAF) had operational control over all units and bases
of Air Force
Tactical Command in peace and wartime, unless noted otherwise.
Operational control was
delegated by Commander Allied
Air Forces Central Europe (COMAAFCE), who held operational
command.3
|
c. |
Soesterberg
Air Base (Vliegbasis Soesterberg, Vlb SSB) was, in NATO terms, a Main
Operating Base
(MOB) as well as a Collocated Operating Base (COB); for the latter see
note d.4
Simplified organisation; for a more comprehensive, generic
depiction of the air base organisation click the blue unit symbol in the
organisational chart above. |
d. |
32 (US)
Tactical Fighter Squadron was detached from US Air Forces Europe
(USAFE) and fell under operational command of COMTWOATAF in peace and
wartime. The squadron operated with sixteen F15C (single seat) and two
F15D (two seat) fighter aircraft in a tactical air defence role (AD).
Two aircraft were permanently, round-the-clock, on standby for
all-weather quick reaction alert sorties (QRA). Accommodation and
logistic support were provided by the Royal Air Force. In
times of crisis or war 32 (US) TFS would be reinforced by a second USAF
F-15 squadron, which would also operate from Soesterberg Air Base (in
its capacity as COB). This
second squadron would presumably also operate in an AD role.5 |
e. |
334
Squadron operated with nine Fokker F-27 Mk 300M Troopships and three
Fokker F-27 Mk 100 Friendships, primarily in a logistic support role. In
wartime, after NATO General Alert, the
squadron would for six days be busy flying national transport missions.
If ACE Mobile
Force (AMF) would be deployed, which would be in the
early
stages of an emerging conflict, preferably ahead of NATO General
Alert, the squadron would transport personnel and war
consumables for 314 Squadron,
which was
assigned to AMF. 334 Squadron would further fly transport missions
for 1
(NL) Corps, the Royal
Navy, and the Royal Air Force air bases in the Netherlands
and the guided weapons squadrons in West Germany. Depending the
circumstances the transport tasks might include dropping
paratroops (Whiskey
Infantry Company and 104
Observation and Reconnaissance Company). After
these six days the squadron would be made available to Supreme Allied Commander Europe
(SACEUR). By 1985 the Fokker F-27 aircraft, though reliable,
were becoming technically obsolete.
Moreover their maximum operating radius
and payload were hardly sufficient for the aforementioned tasks. The
transport requirements for 314 Squadron in its AMF-role for
example "could only be marginally met". Pilots
were mostly experienced former fighter or helicopter pilots who chose
to end their flying careers with 334 Squadron.6 |
f. |
Peacetime
organisation. Part of the Light
Aircraft Group (Groep Lichte Vliegtuigen, GPLV), 1
(NL) Corps, Royal
Army. See also Part
IV, note h. Under
operational command of Commander 1 (NL) Corps in wartime.7 |
g. |
Simplified
organisation; for a comprehensive depiction click the blue squadron
symbol in the organisational chart above. SHORAD: short
range air defence. |
h. |
Peacetime and wartime
strengths include a security dog group (hondengeleiders) of -/5/16 (21).8 |
i. |
Filled
by mobilisable personnel from 14 Armoured Infantry Battalion (RIM)
after their fourteen to sixteen-month RIM period in that unit had
expired, up to eight and a half years prior to mobilisation.9 |
j. |
Leeuwarden
Air Base (Vliegbasis Leeuwarden, Vlb LW) was a Main Operating
Base
(MOB).4
Simplified organisation; for a more comprehensive, generic
depiction of the air base organisation click the blue unit symbol in the
organisational chart above. |
k. |
322
Squadron was operational in a fighter-bomber
attack role (FBA) and a tactical
air defence (AD) role, the latter further
specified as clear weather intercept (CWI). These
roles were weighed as 70 % FBA and 30% AD. The
squadron had two aircraft permanently on standby for clear
weather quick reaction alert sorties (QRA),
day and night. In other weather conditions the QRA flight of
32
(US) Tactical Fighter Squadron would be called upon (see note d).
In wartime the squadron's first operational mission, the 'Option Alpha'
assigned to the air base, would be to bomb one or more predetermined
East German air force bases.10
|
l. |
323
Squadron was operational
in a fighter-bomber
attack role (FBA) and a tactical
air defence (AD) role, the latter further
specified as clear weather intercept (CWI). These
were weighed as 30% AD and 70 % FBA. Between 6
March 1986 and the end of 1991 the FBA role would be suspended because
of the integration of the Transition and Conversion Division, see note
m. The squadron had two aircraft permanently on standby
for clear weather quick reaction alert sorties (QRA),
day and night. In other weather conditions the QRA flight of
32
(US) Tactical Fighter Squadron would be called upon (see note d). In
wartime the
squadron's first operational mission, the 'Option Alpha' assigned to
the air base, would be to bomb one or more predetermined East German
air force bases.10
|
m. |
The
Transition and Conversion Division F-16 (Transitie- en
Conversieafdeling, TCA) handled the retraining of F-104G
Starfighter pilots
to fly the F-16 Fighting Falcon. With six instructors and
three
F-16B (two seat) and four F-16A (single seat) aircraft TCA retrained
three classes of nine to twelve pilots per year. The course lasted
about five months and comprised ground school (four weeks), the
conversion phase in which pilots learned to fly the aircraft solo (ten
flying missions), and the transition phase in which pilots relearned
the
basics of operational flying (fifteen air-to-air missions and ten
air-to-ground missions). TCA further included the 'Ready Team'
which comprised a small number of experienced instructors who coached
F-16 squadrons during their working-up to operational status. In warime
the unit would probably be disbanded and/or move to the United States
to complete retraing there. On 6
March 1986 TCA was integrated into 323 Squadron (see note l).
Between
1986 and 1991 TCA would, as part of 323 Squadron, handle the transition
from the Canadair NF-5 Freedom Fighter to the F-16.11 |
n. |
The
Search and Rescue flight (SAR), also referred to as SAR and
Photo
Flight (SAR- tevens fotovlucht) and SAR and Communications Flight of
the Commander-in-Chief of the Air Force (SAR- tevens communicatievlucht
BDL) was, in peacetime, responsible for the NATO-mandated task of
rescuing fighter pilots who had ran into trouble above the firing and
bombing ranges (Air Combat Areas) on the Wadden Islands of Vlieland and
Terschelling (see note o), or in other areas. The flight would
also perform civilian rescues. Rescue missions were
coordinated
from the Rescue Coordination Centre (Reddingscoördinatiecentrum) at Naval Air Station Valkenburg.
The four Alouette III helicopters were available for rescue missions
from dawn until dusk. On workdays one helicopter was stationed at
Terschelling. Whenever necessary the Flight performed non-mandatory
medical emergency or medical evacuation sorties for the
inhabitants of the Wadden Islands; this was the SAR Flight's
predominant (and self-imposed) peacetime task. Other tasks
were
flying light transport and communications sorties for the Commander-in-Chief
of the Air Force, flying aerial
photography sorties for the Royal Air Force or external
parties
such as State Water Management (Rijkswaterstaat), and, in wartime,
flying airfield damage reconnaissance sorties.12 |
o. |
Vliehors
and De Noordvaarder were firing and bombing ranges, referred to
as Air Combat Areas, used by the tactical fighter-bomber
squadrons
of the Royal Air Force. Both ranges were also
used by squadrons of NATO's 2 and 4 Allied Tactical Air
Force (TWOATAF and FOURATAF) and the
French Air Force.
The ranges were located at the Wadden Islands of, respectively,
Vlieland and Terschelling. Their operational names were,
respectively, Cornfield Range and Jackpot Range. Vliehors also included
a main battle tank firing range of Royal
Army
Training Command: the Cavalry Gunnery Range
(Cavalerieschietkamp, CSK).13 |
p. |
Peacetime and wartime
strengths include a security dog group (hondengeleiders) of -/4/12 (16).8 |
q. |
These
security infantry units would also secure Radar Post North,
which was part of the base security area of Leeuwarden Air Base. |
r. |
Filled
by mobilisable personnel from 16
Armoured Infantry Battalion (RIM)
after their fourteen to sixteen-month RIM period in that unit had
expired, up to eight and a half years prior to mobilisation.9 |
Part
I | Part II |
Part III | Part IV | Part V | Part VI | Part VII | Part VIII
Unit |
Main
Equipment |
Air
Combat Role |
Peace
Strength |
War
Strength |
Volkel
Air Base [a]
|
306
Squadron [b]
|
9/18
x F-16(R) |
RECCE |
?
|
? |
311
Squadron [c]
|
16
x F-16A, 2 x F-16B 29 |
FBA/S |
?
|
? |
312
Squadron [d] |
18
x F-16 from 01.10.1985 |
FBA/S
|
?
|
?
|
420
Squadron [e] |
└ 76
Assault Firing Unit |
3
x I-HAWK |
|
(30-35) |
(±100) |
└ SHORAD
flight |
3
x Flycatcher, 9 x 40L70 |
|
(30-35) |
(±100) |
40
Air Force Security Squadron [f] |
|
|
4/49/263
(316)
|
5/22/155
(182) |
Air
Force Security Platoon x 4 |
|
|
– |
1/4/41 (46)
x 4 |
501
Object Security Squadron [Royal Army] [g] |
|
|
– |
5/15/105
(125) |
502
Object Security Squadron [Royal Army] [g] |
|
|
– |
5/15/105
(125)
|
503
Object Security Squadron [Royal Army] [g] [h] |
|
|
– |
5/15/105
(125)
|
504
Object Security Squadron [Royal Army] [g] [h] |
|
|
– |
5/15/105
(125)
|
523
Object Security Squadron [Royal Army] [g] |
|
|
– |
5/15/105
(125)
|
De
Peel Air Base [i]
|
421
Squadron [e] |
└ 77
Assault Firing Unit |
3
x I-HAWK |
|
(10-15?) |
(±100) |
└ SHORAD
flight |
3
x Flycatcher, 9 x 40L70 |
|
(10-15?) |
(±100) |
50
Air Force Security Squadron [j] |
|
|
-/7/19 (26)
|
5/15/131
(151) |
Air
Force Security Platoon |
|
|
– |
1/4/41 (46) |
Notes
a. |
Volkel
Air Base (Vliegbasis Volkel, Vlb VKL) was a Main Operating Base
(MOB).4
Simplified organisation; for a more comprehensive, generic
depiction of the air base organisation click the blue unit symbol in the
organisational chart above. |
b. |
306
Squadron was
the Royal Air Force's tactical photo reconnaissance squadron. The
aircraft of the squadron were regular F-16A/Bs, not specialised
reconnaissance versions, hence the designation F-16(R). Under
the
fuselage, on the centerline pylon, they carried the Orpheus day/night
reconnaissance pod developed by Oldelft (Oude Delft) and built by
Fokker. The self-contained pod had five TA-8M photo cameras, an
infrared line scanner and a radar altimeter. With the pod the aircraft
could still carry air-to-air missiles and the squadron operated in
pairs for increased self defence. Besides the reconnaissance role
(RECCE) the squadron also trained the air defence (AD) and
fighter-bomber attack (FBA) roles, the latter presumably without the
Orpheus pod. Because of this 306 Squadron
dubbed itself
"NATO's Only Fighting Eyes" and it was the first squadron to
apply
the swing-role concept that the Royal Air Force
developed from the mid 1980s to the early 1990s. In 1985 the squadron
was not yet fully
operational, flying nine F-16(R)s (9 UE, nine units equipped) because
the
transition from the RF-104G Starfighter, which began in 1983,
was
not yet fully completed. In May 1986 the squadron was fully operational
with 18 UE. In wartime the squadron would operate from De Peel Air Base
(see note i).14
|
c |
311
Squadron was dual capable in the conventional fighter-bomber attack
role (FBA) and in the nuclear strike role (S). In 1986 the squadron was
also meant to be operational in the clear weather intercept role (CWI),
but this was not implemented due to personnel shortages, probably pilot
shortages in particular. The US nuclear bombs for the squadron
were stored at the air base under custody of 7362 (US) Munitions
Support
Squadron (7362 MUNSS), which reportedly had a strength of about 100
men. The nuclear bombs were probably of the B61 type with a variable
yield of 0.3 to 170 kilotons (Mod 3, produced since 1979), or 10
to 150 kilotons (Mod 2, since 1975), or 10 to 340 kilotons (Mod 1,
since 1969). The number of nuclear bombs stored at Volkel Air Base was
estimated to be between thirty-six and seventy-two. The squadron, but
probably 311 and 312 Squadron together, reportedly had
three F-16
aircraft on permanent, round-the-clock standby, each armed with one
nuclear bomb (Quick Reaction Alert, QRA). The nuclear release sequence
was probably similar to that of the dual capable artillery of 1 (NL) Corps;
ultimately the decision to deploy any US nuclear weapon lay with the
President of the United States.15 |
d. |
312
Squadron was not operational ("non-ops") up to 1 October 1985 due to
the transition from the F-104G Starfighter, which began on 1 July 1984.
From 1 October 1985 the squadron was dual capable in the conventional
fighter-bomber attack role (FBA) and the nuclear strike role (S). For
the nuclear role, see note c.16 Like the
other F-16 squadrons 312 Squadron had sixteen F-16A single seat and two
F-16B two-seat aircraft.29 |
e. |
Simplified
organisation; for a comprehensive depiction click the blue squadron
symbol in the organisational chart above. SHORAD: short
range air defence. |
f. |
Peacetime and wartime
strengths include a security dog group (hondengeleiders) of -/8/28 (36).8 |
g. |
Filled
by mobilisable personnel from 14 Armoured Infantry Battalion (RIM)
after their fourteen to sixteen-month RIM period in that unit had
expired, up to eight and a half years prior to mobilisation.9 |
h. |
503 and 504 Object Security
Platoon may have been intended for deployment to De Peel Air Base.17 |
i. |
De Peel Airbase (Vliegbasis
De Peel, Vlb PEL) was a Dispersion Operating Base (DOB).4
Simplified organisation. In peacetime it was a 'sleeping base' with
minimal personnel, except during exercises. De Peel was, however, seen
as an operational air base and, like other air bases, it had command
facilities, bunkers and concrete aircraft shelters. If the readiness of
77 AFU can be taken as a measure (operational within twelve hours) it
seems likely the base could be operational within twenty-four hours or
less. In wartime 306 Squadron would operate from this base (see note
b). Both in peace and wartime the base was under control of Volkel
Airbase; in wartime the deputy commander of Volkel Airbase would
probably move to De Peel and act as local subcommander.18
|
j. |
Peacetime and wartime
strengths include a security dog group (hondengeleiders) of -/1/4 (5).8 |
Part I | Part
II |
Part III |
Part IV | Part V | Part VI | Part VII | Part VIII
Unit |
Main
Equipment |
Air
Combat Role |
Peace
Strength |
War
Strength |
Gilze-Rijen
Air
Base [a]
|
316
Squadron
|
18
x NF-5A, 3 x NF-5B 29 |
FBA |
?
|
? |
121 Squadron [b] |
└ 75
Assault Firing Unit |
3
x I-HAWK |
|
(30-35) |
(±100) |
└ SHORAD
flight |
3 x
Flycatcher, 9 x 40L70 |
|
(30-35) |
(±100) |
70
Air Force Security Squadron [c] |
|
|
1/18/100
(119)
|
5/16/167
(188) |
Air
Force Security Platoon x 4 |
|
|
– |
1/4/41 (46)
x 4 |
507
Object Security Squadron [Royal Army] [d] |
|
|
– |
5/15/105
(125) |
508
Object Security Squadron [Royal Army] [d] |
|
|
– |
5/15/105
(125)
|
509
Object Security Squadron [Royal Army] [d] |
|
|
– |
5/15/105
(125)
|
Eindhoven
Air
Base [e]
|
314
Squadron [f]
|
18
x NF-5A, 3 x NF5B 29 |
FBA |
?
|
? |
422 Squadron [b] |
└ 74
Assault Firing Unit |
3
x I-HAWK |
|
(30-35) |
(±100) |
└ SHORAD
flight [g] |
2 x
Flycatcher, 6 x 40L70 |
|
(20-25) |
(±75) |
60
Air Force Security Squadron [h] |
|
|
1/15/52 (68)
|
5/18/144
(167) |
Air
Force Security Platoon x 3 |
|
|
– |
1/4/41 (46)
x 3 |
Notes
a. |
Gilze-Rijen
Air Base was a
Main Operating Base
(MOB), a Collocated Operating Base (COB), and a reserve Lines of
Communications airfield (LOC).4 Simplified
organisation; for a more comprehensive, generic depiction of
the air base organisation click the blue unit symbol in the
organisational chart above. In July
1982 the base had been merged organisationally
with
Eindhoven
Air Base as a cost-cutting measure. The commander of the joined
Eindhoven-Gilze-Rijen Air Base organisation resided at Gilze-Rijen Air
Base, the deputy commander resided at Eindhoven Air Base and some
services were integrated. The merge did not work out well, but would
nonetheless persist until July 1995. In
times of crisis or war two USAF F-15
squadrons would operate from Gilze-Rijen Air Base in its capacity as COB.19 |
b. |
Simplified
organisation; for a comprehensive depiction click the blue squadron
symbol in the organisational chart above. SHORAD: short
range air defence. |
c. |
Peacetime and wartime
strengths include a security dog group (hondengeleiders) of -/8/34 (42).8 |
d. |
Filled
by mobilisable personnel from 14 Armoured Infantry Battalion (RIM)
after their fourteen to sixteen-month RIM period in that unit had
expired, up to eight and a half years prior to mobilisation.9 |
e. |
Eindhoven
Air Base (Vliegbasis Eindhoven, Vlb EHV) was a Main Operating Base
(MOB).4
Simplified organisation; for a more comprehensive, generic depiction of
the air base organisation click the blue unit symbol in the
organisational chart above. Organisationally merged with Gilze-Rijen
Air Base, see note a.
|
f. |
314
Squadron was assigned to the Air component of Allied Command Europe
Mobile Force, ACE Mobile Force for short. AMF was one of
NATO's multinational reaction forces, to be
deployed in times
of emerging international crises on the flanks of NATO. See further
NATO Commands, Multinational Forces.
314 Squadron could be deployed to NATO's northern and southern flanks,
but the emphasis was clearly on the northern flank: the squadron
was deployed to Denmark
or Norway at
least three weeks a year to exercise with other AMF
units. Bodø Air Force Base
in Norway was a frequent destination for training and
exercises. In October 1988 the AMF role was passed on to 315
Squadron, which by then was equipped with
F-16 fighter aircraft.20
|
g. |
The
SHORAD flight of Eindhoven had, at least until the end of 1987, two
rather than three Flycatcher/40L70 combinations. See further Unit
Organisation and Equipment, The Active Air Defence Squadron. |
h. |
Peacetime and wartime
strengths include a security dog group (hondengeleiders) of -/4/17 (21).8 |
Part I | Part II | Part III | Part IV | Part V | Part VI | Part VII | Part VIII
Unit |
Main
Equipment |
Air
Combat Role |
Peace
Strength |
War
Strength |
Twenthe
Air
Base [a]
|
313
Squadron [b]
|
11
x NF-5A, 10 x NF-5B
29 |
FBA |
?
|
? |
315
Squadron [c]
|
18
x NF-5A, 3 x NF-5B 29 |
FBA |
?
|
? |
222 Squadron [d] |
└ 72
Assault Firing Unit |
3
x I-HAWK |
|
(30-35) |
(±100) |
└ SHORAD
flight |
3 x
Flycatcher, 9 x 40L70 |
|
(30-35) |
(±100) |
20
Air Force Security Squadron [e] |
|
|
1/15/57 (73)
|
5/18/139
(162) |
Air
Force Security Platoon x 4 |
|
|
– |
1/4/41 (46)
x 4 |
517
Object Security Squadron [Royal Army] [f] |
|
|
– |
5/15/105
(125) |
518
Object Security Squadron [Royal Army] [f] |
|
|
– |
5/15/105
(125)
|
581
Object Security Platoon [Royal Army] [f] |
|
|
– |
1/4/33
(38) |
Unit |
Main
Equipment |
Peace
Strength |
War
Strength |
Deelen
Air
Base [g]
|
Light Aircraft Group
[h] |
24
x BO-105C, 36 x Alouette III |
105/132/149
(386)
|
166/197/279
(642) |
90
Air Force Security Squadron [i] [j] |
|
1/14/48 (63)
|
5/17/135
(157) |
Air
Force Security Platoon [j] |
|
– |
1/4/41 (46) |
512
Object Security Squadron [Royal Army] [j] [k] |
|
– |
5/15/105
(125) |
513
Object Security Squadron [Royal Army] [j] [k] |
|
– |
5/15/105
(125)
|
Notes
a. |
Twenthe Air Base
(Vliegbasis Twenthe, Vlb TW) was a Main Operating Base (MOB).4
Simplified organisation; for a more comprehensive, generic depiction of
the air base organisation click the blue unit symbol in the
organisational chart above.
|
b. |
313
Squadron provided the Theatre Operational Conversion Course (TOCC) for
recently licensed NF-5 pilots trained in the United States and Canada,
as well as the subsequent
Advanced Operational Course (AOC). In
peacetime these demanding training tasks were predominant for
the
squadron. Because of this it had a larger complement of aircraft, with
more two-seaters. Unlike the NF5-B two-seaters of other squadrons,
those of 313 Squadron were combat-capable.29 In
wartime the squadron would operate in the
Fighter-Bomber Attack role. From
April to August 1985 the squadron operated from Soesterberg Air Base
because of a runway renovation at Twenthe Air Base.21
|
c. |
315
Squadron would start
transitioning to the F-16 on 6 January 1986, on which date a first
group of pilots moved to TCA F-16 at
Leeuwarden Air Base (see Part I).
From 21 to 30 October 1985 the squadron had its last NATO rotation with
the NF-5, deploying to the Italian Air Force Base Grosetto (rotation
with 9º Gruppo, 4º Stormo).22 |
d. |
Simplified
organisation; for a comprehensive depiction click the blue squadron
symbol in the organisational chart above. SHORAD: short
range air defence. |
e. |
Peacetime and wartime
strengths include a security dog group (hondengeleiders) of -/4/12 (16).8 |
f. |
Filled
by mobilisable personnel from 14 Armoured Infantry Battalion (RIM)
after their fourteen to sixteen-month RIM period in that unit had
expired, up to eight and a half years prior to mobilisation.9 |
g. |
Deelen Air Base
(Vliegbasis Deelen, Vlb DL) would serve as a Reserve
Airfield in wartime.4 Simplified
organisation; for a more comprehensive, generic depiction of
the air base organisation click the blue unit symbol in the
organisational chart above. Note
that the air base had no active air defence squadron. |
h. |
Peacetime
organisation. See also Part I, note
f. In wartime the Light
Aircraft Group (Groep Lichte Vliegtuigen, GPLV) would fall
under operational
command of Commander 1
(NL) Corps, Royal
Army
and deploy to its operational field location(s) in West-Germany.7
|
i. |
Peacetime and wartime
strengths include a security dog group (hondengeleiders) of -/3/8 (11).8 |
j. |
The air base security
infantry elements would not deploy with the Light Aircraft Group in
wartime (see note h) but
remain at the air base.8 |
k. |
Filled
by mobilisable personnel from 16
Armoured Infantry Battalion (RIM)
after their fourteen to sixteen-month RIM period in that unit had
expired, up to eight and a half years prior to mobilisation.9 |
Part I | Part II | Part III | Part IV | Part V | Part VI | Part VII | Part VIII
Unit |
Main
Equipment |
Peace
Strength |
War
Strength |
Ypenburg
Air
Base [a]
|
100
Air Force Security Squadron [b] |
|
-/16/30 (46)
|
5/13/126
(144) |
110
Air Force Security Squadron [b] |
|
– |
5/13/126
(144) |
520
Object Security Squadron [Royal Army] [c] |
|
– |
5/15/105
(125) |
521
Object Security Squadron [Royal Army] [d] |
|
– |
5/15/105
(125)
|
593
Object Security Platoon [Royal Army] [d] |
|
– |
1/4/33
(38) |
594
Object Security Platoon [Royal Army] [d] |
|
– |
1/4/33
(38) |
Hato
Air
Base [e]
|
336 Squadron [e] |
2
x Fokker F.27M
|
(32)
|
(32) |
Netherlands
Detachment Crete [f] |
|
–
|
? |
Notes
a. |
Ypenburg Air Base
(Vliegbasis Ypenburg, Vlb YB) was a Reserve Airfield and a Lines of
Communications Airfield (LOC).4 Part of
the Air
Force Staff Corps was based here; the air base commander was
also commander of said corps. The Air
Force Staff School was located here.23
|
b. |
In
peacetime Ypenburg Air Base had an Air Force Security unit (Luchtmacht
Beveiliging, LB)
with a strength of one platoon. Presumably this was 100 Air Force
Security Squadron, to be brought up to war strength on mobilisation and
reinforced by the mobilised 110 Air Force
Security Squadron. Remarkably, neither squadron had a security dog
group, at least in 1980.8
|
c. |
Filled
by mobilisable personnel from 16
Armoured Infantry Battalion (RIM)
after their fourteen to sixteen-month RIM period in that unit had
expired, up to eight and a half years prior to mobilisation.9 |
d. |
Filled
by mobilisable personnel from 14 Armoured Infantry Battalion (RIM)
after their fourteen to sixteen-month RIM period in that unit had
expired, up to eight and a half years prior to mobilisation.9 |
e. |
336
Squadron was based on Hato Airbase, Curaçao, Netherlands Antilles. Both
elements were under operational control of Naval Commander Netherlands
Antilles in peace and wartime. See Royal
Navy, Naval Command Netherlands Antilles,
note d and e. |
f. |
Netherlands
Detachment Crete
in some way facilitated live firing exercises of Royal Air Force
MIM-23B I-HAWK, MIM-14C Nike Hercules missile
crews and
probably, from 1984 or 1985, FIM-92 Stinger instructors at the
extensive NATO Missile Firing Installation (NAMFI) at
Souda Bay on the island of Crete, Greece. Royal
Army MGM-52C Lance
crews of 129
Field Artillery Battalion
and Stinger instructors also held live firing exercises here, so it
seems likely that the detachment included Royal Army personnel as well.
The detachment, to be disbanded in wartime, was not under NATO
operational control in peacetime (see Part I, note b).24 |
Part I | Part II | Part III | Part IV | Part V | Part VI | Part VII | Part VIII
Unit |
Location |
Peace
Strength |
War
Strength |
Control and
Reporting Centre / Military Air Traffic Control Centre [a]
|
Nieuw
Milligen |
? |
? |
Unit |
Location |
Main
Equipment |
Peace
Strength |
War
Strength |
Radar Post North [a] |
Wier |
|
?
|
?
|
└ 78
Assault Firing Unit [b] |
– |
3
x I-HAWK |
? |
(±100) |
└ SHORAD-flight
[b] |
– |
3 x
Flycatcher, 9 x 40L70 |
? |
(±100) |
SHORAD-flight
[c] |
Nieuw Milligen |
3 x
Flycatcher, 9 x 40L70 |
(30-35) |
(±100) |
Air
Force Security Platoon x 3 [d] |
– |
|
-/9/11
(20) |
1/4/41 (46) x 3 |
519
Object Security Squadron [Royal Army] [e] |
– |
|
– |
5/13/126
(144) |
Unit |
Location |
Peace
Strength |
War
Strength |
Air
Force Signal and Meteorological Group [f]
|
Hilversum |
? |
? |
Air
Force Meteorological Centre [f]
|
Hilversum |
? |
? |
Unit |
Location |
Peace
Strength |
War
Strength |
Air
Force Security Platoon x 2 [g] |
Hilversum |
-/6/30
(36) |
1/4/41
(46) x 2 |
556
Object Security Platoon [Royal Army] [e] |
– |
– |
1/4/33
(38) |
557
Object Security Platoon [Royal Army] [e] |
– |
– |
1/4/33
(38) |
Notes
a. |
The
combined Control and Reporting Centre/Military Air Traffic Control
Centre (CRC/MilATCC) was the Royal Air Force's single radar station,
air traffic
control centre, and air defence direction centre, operational in peace
and wartime. It
was located in Nieuw Milligen and operated from an underground
bunker. The Control and Reporting Centre (CRC) had one external radar
post located in Wier: Radar Post North (Radarpost Noord, RPN). RPN was
located in the base security area of Leeuwarden
Air Base and would in wartime be
secured by (mobilised) security infantry units of that base. The
responsibilities of CRC comprised producing a 'recognised air picture'
(detecting, identifying, tracking); exerting tactical control
over the guided weapon groups, the Assault Firing Units
(AFU) and the air defence-roled aircraft squadrons; operating
as Alternate Mission Control Centre (AMCC)
for West German Nike Hercules surface-to-air missile units if MCC
Brockzetel (GE) would become non-operational; and carry out NATO alerting tasks.
RPN served to guarantee a good radar coverage of the North Sea area,
which was important since this area was not already covered by the West
German CRCs in Brockzetel, Visselhövede and
Breckendorf. Together with these CRCs, CRC Nieuw Milligen
(including RPN in Wier) controlled the airspace above and around the
Netherlands and the northern part of West Germany, operating under the
direction
of NATO Sector Operations Centre 1 (SOC 1) in Brockzetel. All
this
was part of the NATO Air Defence Ground Environment System
(NADGE), the integrated air defence system that protected NATO
airspace against intruders. In peacetime CRC Nieuw Milligen operated
with four limited crews to meet the 'minimum readiness posture' set by
Commander Second Allied Tactical Air Force
(COMTWOATAF). In wartime the CRC would be operational around the clock,
operating with three complete crews. The collocated Military Air
Traffic
Control Centre (MilATCC), call sign 'Dutch Mil', did not only control
military air traffic, but also civilian air traffic in a large part of
Dutch airspace. In times of crisis or war all air traffic would come
under control of MilATCC. Responsibilities included collecting and
distributing aeronautical information, alerting Search and Rescue
services (SAR) and initiating SAR-sorties. MilATCC was operational
round the clock in peace and wartime, with three limited crews in
peacetime and two complete crews in wartime. Wartime tasks included
producing a complete air traffic picture of the Netherlands area of
flight intelligence and directing aircraft to their home base or to an
alternate base ('recovery/diversion service').25
|
b. |
The
mobilisable 78 Assault Firing Unit (78 AFU) and Short Range Air
Defence flight (SHORAD) were earmarked for the air
defence of Radar Post North in wartime. In
peacetime their equipment
was in use (and possibly partly stored) with the Guided
Weapons
Training School (Geleide Wapen Opleidingsschool) located at Twenthe Air Base.
78 AFU would be operational within twenty-four hours
from mobilisation; the SHORAD
flight would be operational within, at the most, forty-eight hours
from mobilisation but, given the response time of 78 AFU, probably
within twenty-four hours as well.
Both units would fall under administrative command of 119 Squadron of
nearby Leeuwarden
Air Base, which base would likely also provide logistic
support. With
a maximum range of some thirty-five kilometres the MIM-23B missiles of
78 AFU could easily contribute to the air defence of said air base if
needed; and vice versa for Leeuwarden's 77 AFU.26 |
c. |
This SHORAD
flight was responsible for the air defence of CRC/MilATCC.27 |
d. |
Peacetime and wartime
strengths include a security dog group (hondengeleiders) of -/2/11 (13).8 |
e. |
Filled
by mobilisable personnel from 16
Armoured Infantry Battalion (RIM)
after their fourteen to sixteen-month RIM period in that unit had
expired, up to eight and a half years prior to mobilisation.9 |
f. |
The
Air Force Signal and Meteorological Group (Luchtmacht Verbindings-
Meteorologische Groep, LVMG) formed the Royal Air
Force's meteorological service
and meteorology-related communication service. The collocated Air Force
Meteorological Centre (Luchtmacht Meteorologisch Centrum, LUMETC) was
part of LVMG and formed its operational meteorological element. LVMG was not under NATO operational control in peacetime (see Part I, note b). Schooling and training of LVMG personnel was carried out by Air Force
Meteorological Squadron.28 |
g. |
The two mobilisable
Air Force Security platoons earmarked for LVMG had, at least in 1980,
no security dog group.8 |
Part I | Part II | Part III | Part IV | Part V | Part VI | Part VII | Part VIII
Unit |
Location |
Main
Equipment |
Peace
Strength |
War
Strength |
3
Guided Weapons Group [a]
|
Group
Headquarters/Group Operations Centre [b] |
Blomberg (GE) |
|
?
|
?
|
324
Squadron [c] |
Laatzen (GE) |
6 x
I-HAWK |
(±60)
|
(130-150)
|
└ Stinger
team x 3 [d] |
Laatzen (GE) |
6 x
Stinger |
-/1/4 (5) x 3 |
-/1/4 (5) x 3 |
326
Squadron [c] |
Velmerstot (GE) |
6 x
I-HAWK |
(±60)
|
(130-150)
|
└ Stinger
team x 3 [d] |
Velmerstot (GE) |
6 x
Stinger |
-/1/4 (5) x 3 |
-/1/4 (5) x 3 |
327
Squadron [d] |
Goldbeck (GE) |
6 x
I-HAWK |
(±60)
|
(130-150)
|
└ Stinger
team x 3 [d] |
Goldbeck (GE) |
6 x
Stinger |
-/1/4 (5) x 3 |
-/1/4 (5) x 3 |
328
Squadron [c] |
Schwalenberg (GE) |
6 x
I-HAWK |
(±60)
|
(130-150)
|
└ Stinger
team x 3 [d] |
Schwalenberg (GE) |
6 x
Stinger |
-/1/4 (5) x 3 |
-/1/4 (5) x 3 |
Air
Force Security Platoon x 5 [e] |
[locations
above] |
|
-/32/98
(130) |
5/23/213 (241) |
565
Object Security Platoon [Royal Army] [f] |
– |
|
– |
1/4/33
(38) |
566
Object Security Platoon [Royal Army] [f] |
– |
|
– |
1/4/33
(38) |
567
Object Security Platoon [Royal Army] [f] |
– |
|
– |
1/4/33
(38) |
568
Object Security Platoon [Royal Army] [f] |
– |
|
– |
1/4/33
(38) |
569
Object Security Platoon [Royal Army] [f] |
– |
|
– |
1/4/33
(38) |
584
Object Security Platoon [Royal Army] [f] |
– |
|
– |
1/4/33
(38) |
5 Guided
Weapons Group [a]
|
Group
Headquarters/Group Operations Centre [b] |
Stolzenau (GE) |
|
?
|
?
|
500
Squadron [c] |
Borstel (GE) |
6 x
I-HAWK |
(±60)
|
(130-150)
|
└ Stinger
team x 3 [d] |
Borstel (GE) |
6 x
Stinger |
-/1/4 (5) x 3 |
-/1/4 (5) x 3 |
501
Squadron [c] |
Winzlar (GE) |
6 x
I-HAWK |
(±60)
|
(130-150)
|
└ Stinger
team x 3 [d] |
Winzlar (GE) |
6 x
Stinger |
-/1/4 (5) x 3 |
-/1/4 (5) x 3 |
502
Squadron [c] |
Hoysingausen (GE) |
6 x
I-HAWK |
(±60)
|
(130-150)
|
└ Stinger
team x 3 [d] |
Hoysinghausen (GE) |
6 x
Stinger |
-/1/4 (5) x 3 |
-/1/4 (5) x 3 |
503
Squadron [c] |
Reinsdorf (GE) |
6 x
I-HAWK |
(±60)
|
(130-150)
|
└ Stinger
team x 3 [d] |
Reinsdorf (GE) |
6 x
Stinger |
-/1/4 (5) x 3 |
-/1/4 (5) x 3 |
Air
Force Security Platoon x 5 [e] |
[locations
above] |
|
-/32/98
(130) |
5/23/213 (241) |
570
Object Security Platoon [Royal Army] [g] |
– |
|
– |
1/4/33
(38) |
577
Object Security Platoon [Royal Army] [g] |
– |
|
– |
1/4/33
(38) |
578
Object Security Platoon [Royal Army] [g] |
– |
|
– |
1/4/33
(38) |
579
Object Security Platoon [Royal Army] [g] |
– |
|
– |
1/4/33
(38) |
589
Object Security Platoon [Royal Army] [f] |
– |
|
– |
1/4/33
(38) |
590
Object Security Platoon [Royal Army] [g] |
– |
|
– |
1/4/33
(38) |
Notes
a. |
Simplified organisation. 3
and 5 Guided Weapons Group (Groep Geleide Wapens, GGW) were
each responsible for
a sector of the Low Missile Engagement Zone (LOMEZ) in the NATO
surface-to-air missile belt which ran across the
eastern parts of NATO territory. These sectors lay in the
corps
rear areas of I (GE) Corps and 1 (BR) Corps. Both
groups were fully mobile and able to operate independently. They
were under
operational command of NATO's Second
Allied Tactical Air Force
(TWOATAF) in peace and wartime, through,
subsequently, the Air Defence Operations Centre (ADOC) in
Maastricht, Sector Operations Centre 2 (SOC 2) in Uedem (GE) and
Control and Reporting Centre (CRC) Auenhausen (GE). If needed this
chain of command could be shortened by bypassing intermediate command
levels or delegating operational command to one of the lower
command levels.30
|
b. |
The
Group Headquarters (Groepshoofdkwartier, GHK) was collocated with the
Group Operations Centre (Groepsoperatiecentrum, GOC), often
referred to by the US Army designation Battalion Operations
Centre
(BOC). GOC was the group's primary fire coordination centre.31
32
|
c. |
Ground-based mobile
air defence squadron equipped with MIM-23B
I-HAWK medium range surface-to-air-missile systems. The squadron would
operate in two firing platoons, referred to as the 'main' launching
section and
the Platoon Command Post launching section (PCP).32 The
'main' launching
section comprised Battery Control Central (= squadron control central)
/ Information and Coordination Central (BCC/ICC) equipped with Identification
Friend or Foe (IFF), Pulse
Acquisition Radar (PAR), Continuous Wave Acquisition Radar (CWAR) and
High-Power Illumination Radar (HIPIR). BCC/ICC operated as fire control
element. The 'main' launching section had three M192 mobile launchers,
each
with three missiles mounted. The Platoon Command Post
launching
section comprised the PCP, equipped with IFF, CWAR, HIPIR and again
three M192 launchers with each three missiles mounted. Usually both
sections (platoons) would be directed simultaneously from BCC/ICC, but
they could operate independently and separately if necessary. Within a
section
the launchers were positioned at about ninety to one
hundred meters from the Platoon Command Post. The distances between the
equipment elements were a compromise between security, maximum
spread and cable lengths. The
squadron could operate at a distance of up to twenty
kilometres
from the Group Operations Centre (see note b). It had operational and
logistical support which included communications, power generators,
fuel supply, transport, maintenance and materiel support, medical
support and a field kitchen group. The
squadron had
one full reload for each launcher, so
another eighteen missiles, which brought the squadron's basic load to
thirty-six missiles in total. Behind this there was virtually
no stock, which made prolonged operations very unlikely. It
was
however thought that, in wartime, the chance a
squadron would
be able to fire all its missiles, and survive unscathed, was small. In peacetime the squadrons of 3 and 5 GGW maintained a constant high readiness status in accordance with Allied Command Europe Forces standards:
of each GGW one squadron could be ready to fire within twenty minutes,
a second squadron within three hours and the two remaining
squadrons within twelve hours.33
|
d. |
Deployed
at a distance of about six kilometres from the deployment area
of the I-HAWK squadron to which they were attached, the three Stinger
teams, each equipped with 2 x FIM-92
Stinger man-portable
air defence system,
covered the
dead corners of the squadron's I-HAWK systems.
They also provided air (self) defence
during redeployments of the squadron. Targets had to be identified visually.
A
Stinger team comprised one commander (sergeant) and two sections, each
section comprising one spotter and one gunner
(corporals/soldiers). The team had 1 x ¾-tonne
Land Rover with
trailer, radios, tents, camouflage nets, eleven missiles and
victuals for several days. Stinger teams were formed from Air Force
Security personnel (Luchtmacht Beveiliging, LB), for the larger
part conscripts. The FIM-92 Stinger entered service with 3 and
5
Guided Weapons Group in December 1985; they replaced the M55
Quad
anti-aircraft heavy
machine gun .50 inch.34 |
e. |
Peace
and wartime strengths include a security dog group (hondengeleiders) of
-/3/8 (11). In peacetime this personnel was probably organised in five
Air Force Security (Luchtmachtbeveiliging, LB)
detachments. After mobilisation five LB platoons would
be formed, filled out with mobilised personnel. One platoon
would secure the Group Headquarters/Group Operations Centre,
the four
remaining platoons would each be assigned to one of the
four I-HAWK
squadrons.8 35 |
f. |
Filled
by mobilisable personnel from 16
Armoured Infantry Battalion (RIM)
after their fourteen to sixteen-month RIM period in that unit had
expired, up to eight and a half years prior to mobilisation.9
36 After
mobilisation
each of these four platoons would be assigned to one of the four I-HAWK
squadrons.35
The two remaining platoons would probably secure the Group
Headquarters/Group Operations Centre. |
g. |
Filled
by mobilisable personnel from 14 Armoured Infantry Battalion (RIM)
after their fourteen to sixteen-month RIM period in that unit had
expired, up to eight and a half years prior to mobilisation.9
36 After
mobilisation
each of these four platoons would be assigned to one of the four I-HAWK
squadrons.35
The two remaining platoons would probably secure the Group
Headquarters/Group Operations Centre. |
Part I | Part II | Part III | Part IV | Part V | Part VI | Part VII | Part VIII
Unit |
Location |
Main
Equipment |
Peace
Strength |
War
Strength |
12
Guided Weapons Group [a]
|
Group
Headquarters/Group Operations Centre [b] |
Hesepe (GE) |
|
?
|
?
|
118
Squadron [c] |
Vörden (GE) |
9 x
Nike Hercules |
(± 240)
|
(± 300)
|
└ SHORAD
section x 2 |
Vörden (GE) |
2 x
Flycatcher, 6 x 40L70 |
(20-25) |
(± 75) |
220
Squadron [c] |
Schöppingen (GE) |
9 x
Nike Hercules |
(± 240)
|
(± 300)
|
└ SHORAD
section x 2 |
Schöppingen (GE) |
2 x
Flycatcher, 6 x 40L70 |
(20-25) |
(±
75) |
Air
Force Security Platoon x 5 [d] |
[locations
above] |
|
4/34/208
(246) |
5/38/237
(280) |
561
Object Security Platoon [Royal Army] [e] |
– |
|
– |
1/4/33
(38) |
562
Object Security Platoon [Royal Army] [e] |
– |
|
– |
1/4/33
(38) |
563
Object Security Platoon [Royal Army] [e] |
– |
|
– |
1/4/33
(38) |
571
Object Security Platoon [Royal Army] [e] |
– |
|
– |
1/4/33
(38) |
572
Object Security Platoon [Royal Army] [e] |
– |
|
– |
1/4/33
(38) |
573
Object Security Platoon [Royal Army] [e] |
– |
|
– |
1/4/33
(38) |
574
Object Security Platoon [Royal Army] [e] |
– |
|
– |
1/4/33
(38) |
575
Object Security Platoon [Royal Army] [e] |
– |
|
– |
1/4/33
(38) |
Notes
a. |
Simplified organisation. 12
Guided Weapons Group (12 Groep Geleide Wapens, 12 GGW) was responsible
for
a sector of the High Missile Engagement Zone (HIMEZ) of the NATO
surface-to-air missile belt which ran across the
eastern parts of NATO territory. This sector lay in the rear
combat zone behind the corps areas of I (GE) Corps and 1 (BR) Corps. Unlike
3 and 5 Guided Weapons Group, 12 GGW was not mobile and bound to fixed,
fairly extensive launching areas. The group
was under
operational command of NATO's Second
Allied Tactical Air Force
(TWOATAF) in peace and wartime, through,
subsequently, the Air Defence Operations Centre (ADOC) in
Maastricht, Sector Operations Centre 2 (SOC 2) in Uedem (GE) and
Control and Reporting Centre Uedem (CRC Uedem). If needed this
chain of command could be shortened by bypassing intermediate command
levels or delegating operational command to one of the lower
command levels. By 1985 the MIM-14C
Nike Hercules surface-to-air missile systems, with which the group was
equipped, had become obsolete and were being phased out by the Royal
Air
Force in anticipation of the new mobile MIM-104 Patriot
surface-to-air-missile system. Nike
Hercules had its technical roots in the late 1940s; its rate of fire
was low, the system could only engage one target at a time and its
tactical immobility made it vulnerable to enemy attack. Besides
this the operational use of Nike Hercules, targeting large enemy
bomber formations, had also become outdated. 12 GGW
initially had four squadrons; 120 and 223 Squadron had been disbanded
in March 1983 and June 1984 respectively. 118 and 220 Squadron would
follow in March 1988 and Juli 1987 respectively; finally 12 GGW would
be disbanded in April 1988. 502 Squadron
of 5 GGW was the first to become operational with Patriot, in April
1987.37
|
b. |
The
Group Headquarters (Groepshoofdkwartier, GHK) was collocated with the
Group Operations Centre (Groepsoperatiecentrum, GOC), often
referred to by the US Army designation Battalion Operations
Centre
(BOC). GOC was the group's primary fire coordination centre.31
32
|
c. |
Ground-based air
defence squadron equipped with non-mobile MIM-14C
Nike Hercules long range, medium and high
altitude surface-to-air-missile systems. The squadron
comprised the commander and his staff, a service support and
administrative flight, a technical flight, a ground-operations (security) flight and an operations flight. The operations flight
comprised a small
command element and three combat crews,
each led by a
Battery Control Officer (BCO). The three combat crews each
comprised a fire control section and a launching section with three
launchers. The
three launching sections were numbered A(lpha), B(ravo) and
C(harlie). Each had a minimum strength of twenty men. The fire control section, with a minimum strength of nine
men, had a Battery Control Trailer (BCT), Radar Control Trailer (RCT), Identification Friend or Foe (IFF), High Power
Acquisition Radar (HIPAR), Low Power Acquisition Radar (LOPAR), Missile
Tracking Radar (MTR), Target Tracking Radar (TTR) and Target Ranging
Radar (TRR). At full strength a combat crew had a strength of about thirty-five men. The squadron operated from three main areas: the Integrated Fire Control area (IFC), the launching area (Launching Control Area, LCA or LA for short) and the administrative
area. The distance between IFC and LCA was between 900 to 5400
metres, the administrative area could be located several
kilometres from IFC and LCA. Both 118 and 220 Squadron were dual
capable up to a few months prior to their deactivation and disbandment in 1988 and 1987 respectively (see note a). For a
nuclear fire mission one or more Nike Hercules missiles would be fitted
with a W31 nuclear warhead, which reportedly had a yield of 2 kilotons
(version BXS: NIKE type B, Special, Small). These warheads were
property of the United States and stored with the Alpha and Bravo launching
sections in the Launching Control Area, under
custody of 509 US Army Artillery Detachment (509 USAAD),
which had a strength of 125 men and was subordinate to 5 US Army Artillery Group (5 USAAG) in Büren (GE).
Around the Alpha and Bravo launching sections there was a security ring
that was permanently guarded by Air Force Security troops
(Luchtmacht
Beveliging, LB). The nuclear release sequence
was probably similar to that of the dual capable artillery of 1 (NL) Corps.
Ultimately the decision to deploy any US nuclear weapon lay with the
President of the United States. Nuclear fire missions could be directed
at air targets, envisioned as enemy bomber formations and, in a
secondary role, against ground targets such as enemy troop
concentrations or
enemy military infrastructure. Conventional fire missions would
target enemy aircraft formations only. Alpha
and Bravo launching section were each equipped with five nuclear (BXS)
missiles and six conventional missiles (version BHE: NIKE type B, High Explosive),
Charlie Section was equipped with eleven conventional BHE missiles,
bringing the squadron's basic load to ten nuclear and twenty-three
conventional missiles; thirty-three missiles in total. Behind this there was virtually
no stock, which made prolonged operations very unlikely. It
was
however thought that, in wartime, the chance a
squadron would
be able to fire all its missiles, and survive unscathed, was small. In peacetime the two squadrons of 12 GGW maintained a constant high
readiness status in accordance with Allied Command Europe
Forces standards:
one squadron could be ready
to fire within thirty minutes, the second squadron within three
hours or, in case of monthly maintenance, within twelve hours.38
|
d. |
Distribution of
personnel may have been as follows: in peacetime organised in two
platoons or detachments; one, 2/14/104 (120) strong,
securing
the Group Headquarters/Group
Operations Centre and 118 Squadron. The other, 2/14/92 (108) strong,
securing 220 Squadron. In peace
and wartime these three elements probably each had one security dog
group (hondengeleiders)
of -/2/4 (6) strong. After
mobilisation five platoons would be formed. One
platoon, at the standard organic strength of 1/4/41 (46), would
secure the Group Headquarters/Group Operations Centre,
whilst 118 and 220 Squadron would each be secured by two platoons, each
1/7/46 (54) strong. The five platoons
would be assigned to the units they secured.8
39 |
e. |
Filled
by mobilisable personnel from 16
Armoured Infantry Battalion (RIM)
after their fourteen to sixteen-month RIM period in that unit had
expired, up to eight and a half years prior to mobilisation.9 After
mobilisation these eight security infantry platoons would probably
be
assigned as follows: three to each Nike Hercules squadron, and two to
the Group
Headquarters/Group Operations Centre. |
_________________________________________________
1. |
|
Organisation: NL-HaNA
2.13.182, inv. nr. 663, Concept krijgsmachtdeelplan
Koninklijke Luchtmacht 1987-1996 d.d. 20 december 1985, 88-89.
NIMH
430, inv. nr. 54 (Slagorde KL stand 1 juli 1985),
Blad E en S2. NIMH
723, inv. nr. 75, Organisatie en organisatieschema's m.b.t. de KLu d.d.
1 augustus 1984, 22. HTK 1983-1984,
kamerstuknr. 18169 ondernr. 2
(Defensienota 1984-1993), 133. Fighter-bomber
squadrons aircraft strength: see footnote 29. Air base
ground-based air defence units: NL-HaNA, 2.13.182, inv. nr. 663,
op.cit., 53-54. Helfferich, Squadrons
(1994), passim. Van Loo, Crossing,
342. De Winter, Een eeuw,
160. Air Force Security and Object security units: NL-HaNA
2.13.113, inv. nr. 814, Indeling
LB/OB-eenheden d.d. 18 februari 1980, Bijlagen A, C, D en E.
NIMH
430, loc. cit. It should be noted that on this page the organisational
charts do not show strictly operational command relations, but rather
locational and/or administrative relations; aircraft squadrons for
example were not under operational command of air base commanders but
fell under (subcommands of) NATO's Second
Allied Tactical Air Force (TWOATAF); see Part I, note b; see
also Unit Organisation and Equipment, The Active Air Defence Squadron,
last paragraph. |
2. |
|
NL-HaNA
2.13.182, inv. nr. 663, op.cit., 85. NIMH 723, inv. nr. 75, op. cit., 27, 35-36.
|
3. |
|
Ibid., 85, 86,
88-89. |
4. |
|
Ibid.,
55-56. Main Operating Base (MOB): air base permanently housing one or
more NATO-assigned aircraft squadrons. Reserve
Airfield: to be operational within three days on
order of the Commander-in-Chief of the Air Force, enabling one combat
aircraft squadron to operate from the air base under wartime conditions.
Reserve Airfields were seen purely as emergency facilities. Dispersion
Operating Base (DOB): air base without aircraft squadrons permanently
stationed in peacetime, housing at least one combat aircraft squadron in times
of crisis or war. Collocated Operating Base
(COB):
air base that could accommodate one or more allied combat
aircraft
squadrons in times of crisis or war. This was laid down
in bilateral agreements (Netherlands-US and Netherlands-UK).
Ibid. Lines of Communications airfield (LOC): airfield or air base
earmarked to receive and transfer allied reinforcements in the form of
personnel, equipment or supplies coming in from the United States and
possibly the UK. LOC airfields would be opened on NATO Simple Alert, or sooner if
bilaterally agreed. Ibid, 55-57, 61, 117-118.
|
5. |
|
Ibid., 60,
117. Helfferich, Nederlandse
Koninklijke, 157, 158. De Winter, op.cit.,
204-205. |
6. |
|
NL-HaNA
2.13.182, inv. nr. 663, op.cit., 55, 112. Helfferich,
Squadrons
(1994), 209, 212. Van Loo, op. cit., 356, 358.
|
7. |
|
NIMH 430, loc.
cit. NL-HaNA
2.13.182, inv. nr. 663, op.cit., 88-89. |
8. |
|
NL-HaNA
2.13.113, inv. nr. 814, op. cit., Bijlagen D en E. |
9. |
|
NIMH 205A/10,
Aflossing van mobilisabele eenheden en -aanvullingen d.d. 27 mei 1980.
Ibid., d.d. 11 november
1983. |
10. |
|
Helfferich, Squadrons (1994),
168-169, 176-177, 180, 185-186, 281-282. De Jong et al., Voor vriend,
102-103, 106-107. |
11. |
|
Helfferich,
ibid, 185-186, 281-282. De Jong et al.,
ibid., 102-103. |
12. |
|
NL-HaNA
2.13.182, inv. nr. 663, op. cit., 59, 66, 68, 80-81. De Jong et al.,
op. cit., 89-90, 126, 172-175. Helfferich, Squadrons (1994),
279-280. |
13. |
|
Helfferich, Nederlandse Koninklijke,
46. Smit, Leopard 1,
64. |
14. |
|
Helfferich, Squadrons (1994),
130-132. Relocation to De Peel in wartime: Helfferich, Nederlandse Koninklijke,
36. Swing role concept: developed from the multi-role
capabilities
of the F-16. Swing role meant that an aircraft could switch
tasks
(roles) during a mission, for example from Fighter-Bomber Attack to Air
Defence. Van Loo, op. cit., 148. |
15. |
|
NL-HaNA
2.13.182, inv. nr. 663, op. cit., 50. Helfferich,
Squadrons
(1994), 135-138. Anonymus, Opslag
en transport, 4, 30, 70. Website
The Nuclear Weapon Archive, Complete List of All U.S. Nuclear Weapons.
Wikipedia, B61 nuclear bomb. Dual capable: "A
nuclear certified delivery unit capable of executing both conventional
and nuclear missions." US Department of Defense Dictionary,
139. For reference: the atomic
bomb dropped on Hiroshima in 1945 had a yield
of 15 to 16 kilotons. |
16. |
|
Helfferich, Squadrons (1994),
140-142. |
17. |
|
A 1980
document on the distribution of security infantry units shows these
units assigned to De Peel Airbase. NL-HaNA
2.13.113, inv. nr. 814, op. cit., Bijlage B.
The 1985 Royal Army order of battle shows them assigned to Volkel Air
Base. NIMH
430, op. cit., Blad S2. This may be because De Peel Airbase was a
subcommand of Volkel Air Base. Their mobilisation location, Erp, was
close to both air bases. |
18. |
|
NL-HaNA
2.13.182, inv. nr. 663, op. cit., 75.
Website 306 Squadron, Dagboeken, 306 artikelen, passim. Primary
information kindly provided by Royal Air
Force Lieutenant-Colonel R. Dorenbos (Rtd.) (emails 27.05.2023 and
19.06.2023). |
19. |
|
Organisational
merge: Van Loo et al., 100
jaar,
127-128. Merge not working out well: there were persistent unclarities,
and sometimes frictions between both locations. Ibid. USAF
F-15 squadrons n wartime: NL-HaNA
2.13.182, inv. nr. 663, op. cit., 117. |
20. |
|
Helfferich, Squadrons
(1983), 90. Helfferich, Squadrons
(1994), 151-154, 156. |
21. |
|
Helfferich, Squadrons
(1994), 144, 146-147. De Winter, op. cit.,
157. |
22. |
|
Helfferich, Squadrons
(1994), 156, 158. |
23. |
|
Information
kindly provided by Royal Air Force
Lieutenant-Colonel R. Dorenbos (Rtd.) (email 21.06.2023). Beeldbank
NIMH, obj. nrs. 2157_048625 and 2157_022121. Website VOFE
Ypenburg, Calendarium vliegveld Ypenburg, 3. |
24. |
|
Nederlof, Blazing Skies,
228-229, 319,
Bijlage I. Van Loo et al., Verenigd,
244. Nederlof appears to suggest that the detachment was only
six men strong, being part of the NAMFI international (NATO) Scoring
and Evaluation Section (S&E). Apart from this section NAMFI was
an entirely Greek
organisation. The firing programme was a responsibility of Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe
(SHAPE). Nederlof, op. cit., 229. Not under NATO operational control: NL-HaNA,
2.13.182, inv. nr. 663,
op. cit., 89. |
25. |
|
NL-HaNA,
2.13.182, inv. nr. 663,
op. cit., 35, 54, 57, 63, 76. Van Loo, op. cit., 127-131. RPN secured by
security infantry of Leeuwarden Air Base: NL-HaNA
2.13.113, inv. nr. 814, op. cit., Bijlagen B en D. |
26. |
|
NL-HaNA,
2.13.182, inv. nr. 663,
op.cit., 53-54, 75-76. 78 AFU: Van Loo et
al., op. cit., 259. Website Grondgebonden luchtverdediging, GGW's. Further information kindly
provided by Royal
Air Force Lieutenant-Colonel R. Dorenbos (Rtd.) (emails 08.04.2023 and
28.05.2023). Van Loo, op. cit.,782 notes that Radar Post North
never had a SHORAD-flight, but the author appears to have overlooked
mobilisable units; he also does not mention 78 AFU. Ibid.,
341. The readiness of these mobilisable units meant that Radar
Post
North would be virtually without ground-based air defences for
up to twenty-four hours after mobilisation, with
only fighter aircraft for protection. |
27. |
|
Given its
vital importance it seems remarkable that CRC/MilATCC had no
Assault Firing Unit to provide medium range
air defence. |
28. |
|
Van Loo, op.
cit., 131-132. See also website Vereniging
Officieren Verbindingsdienst, Intercom
nr. 2 2017, R.H. Rijntalder: Krijgsmacht Telefoon- en Telegraafbureau, Deel 2, 68. Not under NATO operational control: NL-HaNA,
2.13.182, inv. nr. 663,
op. cit., 89. |
29. |
|
Fighter-bomber
squadron standard operational strength in peace and wartime:
eighteen aircraft (18 UE). NL-HaNA,
2.13.182, inv. nr. 663,
op.cit., 50. Starink, Gevechtsvliegtuigen voor de KLu,
Deel 5: Beschouwing, 114. F-16
squadron strengths: Ibid., Deel 4: MRCA-75 en F-16, 79.
F-16A/B: single/two seat. The F-16B two-seater was combat capable.
Ibid. NF-5 squadron strengths: Starink, op. cit., Deel 3: Het NF-5 project, 29.
NF5A/B: single/two seat. The NF-5B was for training only, except those
of 313 Squadron which were
combat capable. Ibid. 313 Squadron aircraft strength: ibid. |
30. |
|
NL-HaNA,
2.13.182, inv. nr. 663,
op.cit., 52. Website Grondgebonden
luchtverdediging, Command & Control geleide wapens.
For the NATO air defence belt,
see website Grondgebonden luchtverdediging, Doctrine geleide wapens
and Introductie geleide wapens.
Note that the map displayed there shows the belt in West Germany in the
mid-1960s, when the Royal Air Force still had five guided
weapon
groups stationed there. Since 1975 this had become three guided weapon
groups. Ibid., GGW's.
Similar and more detailed maps can be found in Nederlof, op. cit, 63,
87 and Van Loo et al., Verenigd,
223. The latter work notes that in wartime the NATO air defence belt
was estimated to last forty-eight hours at the most. Ibid.,
222. |
31. |
|
Nederlof, op.
cit., Bijlage I, Het Hawk-wapensysteem. |
32. |
|
The
mixed usage of Royal Air Force and US Army nomenclature (the
latter no doubt caused by the integration in a NATO chain of command)
is, to the outsider, confusing
and also somewhat peculiar: on the one hand the Royal Air Force was
keen to
avoid Royal Army designations like 'bataljon',
'compagnie' and 'peloton', on the other hand equivalent US
Army designations were frequently used. |
33. |
|
Nederlof,
op. cit., 206-207, Bijlage I, Het Hawk-wapensysteem. Royal
Air Force Lieutenant-Colonel R. Dorenbos (Rtd.), emails 08.04.2023,
10.04.2023. Readiness: NL-HaNA,
2.13.182, inv. nr. 663,
op.cit., 75. |
34. |
|
Van
Loo et al., op. cit., 250-251. Nederlof, op. cit., Bijlage I, De
Stinger. M55 Quad: in 1967 the Royal Air Force had acquired seventy
M55's from the Royal Army, so in theory each HAWK squadron may have
had eight M55s before December 1985; however, three seems more likely. |
35. |
|
Royal
Air Force Lieutenant-Colonel R. Dorenbos (Rtd.), email 13.06.2023. |
36. |
|
In
the organisational charts (structuurschema's) of the official
July 1985 Royal Army order of battle, 589 and 590 Object Security
Platoon
(sub 5 Guided Weapons Group) are erroneously numbered 580 and 596
respectively. Those units did not
exist. NIMH 430, op. cit. |
37. |
|
See footnote 30. Dorenbos, The Nike Hercules,
4-5. (This ebook provides a detailed historical and
technical description of 12 Guided Weapons Group and its Nike Hercules
missile systems. A version in Dutch can be found here.) |
38. |
|
Dorenbos, op. cit., 4-8, 23, 28-29. Nederlof, op. cit., Hoofdstuk 12, Bijlage I, Het Nike-wapensysteem. Anonymus, Opslag en transport, 71. Additional information kindly provided by Royal
Air Force Lieutenant-Colonel R. Dorenbos (Rtd.), emails 08.04.2023 and 10.04.2023. Dual capable: "A
nuclear certified delivery unit capable of executing both conventional
and nuclear missions." US Department of Defense Dictionary,
139. Nederlof,
op. cit., 284, reports that the nuclear W31 warhead in its BXS version
had a yield of one, rather than two kilotons. The author also mentions
the BXL version (NIKE type B, Special, Large) with a yield of five
kilotons. Ibid. Dorenbos, op. cit., 23, reports a twenty kiloton yield for the BXL version, but also notes that this version had been phased out by 1981. For reference: the atomic
bomb dropped on Hiroshima in 1945 had a yield
of 15 to 16 kilotons. Readiness: NL-HaNA,
2.13.182, inv. nr. 663,
op.cit., 75. Dorenbos, op. cit., 67. |
39. |
|
It
should be noted that the primary source for this (see footnote 8) dates
from 1980, at which time 12 GGW still had four squadrons
and, in wartime, nine Air Force Security platoons. The unit
strengths given here have been derived by subtracting four platoons
(two for each disbanded squadron) and one security dog group. This may
not be completely accurate for 1985. |
|